Repensando el Nuevo Orden Internacional. La crítica marxista dependentista y lo político en la teoría anticolonial estadounidense
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67215/wirapuru.1548Palabras clave:
-Resumen
.
Referencias
Anghie, A. (2015). Legal aspects of the new international economic order. Humanity, 6(1), 145–158.
Anghie, A. (2019). Inequality, human rights, and the new international economic order. Humanity, 10(3), 429–442.
Bambirra, V. (1974). Integración monopólica mundial e industrialización: Sus contradicciones. Universidad Central de Venezuela, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales.
Bambirra, V. (1978). Teoría de la dependencia: Una anticrítica. Ediciones Era.
Baran, P. (1957). The political economy of growth. Monthly Review Press.
Baran, P., & Sweezy, P. M. (1966a). Monopoly capital. NYU Press.
Baran, P., & Sweezy, P. M. (1966b). Notas sobre la teoría del imperialismo. Monthly Review - Selecciones en Castellano, 31.
Beitz, C. E. (1999). Political theory and international relations (Original work published 1979). Princeton University Press.
Bell, D. (2013). Making and taking worlds. In S. Moyn & A. Sartori (Eds.), Global intellectual history (pp. 254–279). Columbia University Press.
Bose, A. (2024). Vigilance as a practice of postcolonial freedom. American Political Science Review, 118 (4), 1614–1627.
Cammack, P. (2022). Review of Worldmaking after empire. https://www.whatsworthreading.com/worldmaking-after-empire.html
Dia, M. (1960). Nations africaines et solidarité mondiale. Presses Universitaires de France.
Dos Santos, T. (1969). La nueva dependencia. In J. Matos Mar (Ed.), La crisis del desarrollismo y la nueva dependencia. Moncloa-Campodónico.
Dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. American Economic Review, 60(2), 231–236.
Dos Santos, T. (1972). La crisis de la teoría del desarrollo y las relaciones de dependencia en América Latina (Original work published 1968). Centro Interamericano de Desarrollo Rural y Reforma Agraria - OEA, 177.
Emmanuel, A. (1972). Unequal exchange: A study of the imperialism of trade. Monthly Review Press.
Evans, P. B. (1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press.
Fajardo, M. (2021). The world that Latin America created: The United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America in the development era. Harvard University Press.
Forst, R. (2024). The noumenal republic: Critical constructivism after Kant. Polity.
Frank, A. G. (1973). La dependencia ha muerto: Viva la dependencia y la lucha de clases. Desarrollo Económico, 13(49), 199–219.
Geddes, B. (2003). Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. University of Michigan Press.
Getachew, A. (2019). Worldmaking after empire: The rise and fall of self-determination. Princeton University Press.
Gould, C. C. (2024). What is the structure in structural injustice? Social Theory and Practice, 50(3), 431–457.
Hickel, J., Hanbury Lemos, M., & Barbour, F. (2024). Unequal exchange of labour in the world economy. Nature Communications, 15(1), 1–12.
Kay, C. (2019). Theotonio dos Santos (1936–2018): The revolutionary intellectual who pioneered dependency theory. Development and Change, 50(2), 599–630.
Love, J. L. (1980). Raúl Prebisch and the origins of the doctrine of unequal exchange. Latin American Research Review, 15(3), 45–72.
Manigat, M. P. (2021). Baran y Sweezy en América Latina: La Monthly Review y la formación de la teoría marxista de la dependencia. Políticas de la Memoria, 21, 183–197.
Margulis, M. E. (2017). The global political economy of Raúl Prebisch. In M. E. Margulis (Ed.), The global political economy of Raúl Prebisch (pp. 1–21). Routledge.
Marini, R. M. (2022). The dialectics of dependency (Original work published 1972). Monthly Review Press.
Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse (Original work published 1857–1858). Penguin Books.
Marx, K. (1991). Capital: Volume III (D. Fernbach, Trans.; Original work published 1894). Penguin.
Moyn, S. (2020). The high tide of anticolonial legalism. Journal of the History of International Law, 23(1), 5–31.
Moyn, S. (2023). Liberalism against itself: Cold War Intellectuals and the Making of our times. Yale University Press.
Prashad, V. (2007). The darker nations: A people’s history of the Third World. The New Press.
Prebisch, R. (1962). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems (Original work published 1949). Economic Bulletin for Latin America, 7(1), 1–22.
Prebisch, R. (1979). Some reflections on the vicissitudes of development. Trade and Development: An UNCTAD Review, 1, 1–6.
Quijano, A. (1977). ‘Polo marginal’ y ‘mano de obra marginal’. In Imperialismo y ‘marginalidad’ en América Latina (Original work published 1970). Mosca Azul.
Rajagopal, B. (2003). International law from below: Development, social movements and Third World resistance. Cambridge University Press.
Rice, J. (2007). Ecological unequal exchange. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48(1), 43–72.
Saito, K. (2017). Karl Marx’s ecosocialism: Capital, nature, and the unfinished critique of political economy. NYU Press.
Temin, D. M. (2023). Development in decolonization. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 235–248.
Valdez, I. (2023). Democracy and empire: Labor, nature, and the reproduction of capitalism. Cambridge University Press.
Valdez, I. (2026). Capitalism, imperialism, and the paradox of dependent democracy. [Manuscrito no publicado]. Johns Hopkins University.
Vázquez-Arroyo, A. Y. (2014). At the edges of civic freedom: Violence, power, enmity. In R. Nichols & J. Singh (Eds.), Freedom and democracy in an imperial context: Dialogues with James Tully (pp. 48–70). Routledge.
Wallerstein, I. (2004). The scholarly mainstream and reality: Are we at a turning point? In I. Wallerstein (Ed.), The modern world-system in the longue durée (pp. 219–228). Routledge.
Yu, Y., Feng, K., & Hubacek, K. (2013). Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1178–1186.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
